Editorial: Special Issue on Global South and Disability
Main Article Content
Keywords
disability, global south
Abstract
This editorial provides an overview of the Special Issue: Global South and Disability and outlines its purpose and the content of the issue.
References
Abay, R. A., & Soldatic, K. (2024). Intersectional colonialities: Embodied colonial violence and practices of resistance at the axis of disability, race, indigeneity, class, and gender. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003280422
Anand, S. (2022). Advertising as Activism: Exploring an Aesthetics of Debility in Kashmiri Human Rights Campaigns. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 16(4), 457-474. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/870825.
Annamma, S. A. (2018). The pedagogy of pathologization: Dis/abled girls of color in the school-prison nexus. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315523057
Annamma, S., & Morrison, D. (2018). DisCrit Classroom Ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.008
AP News. (2024, May 6). Israel begins military operation in Rafah, hours after Hamas agrees to a cease-fire. AP News. https://apnews.com/live/cease-fire-israel-hamas-updates
Bell, C. (2006). Introducing white disability studies: A modest proposal. In L. J. Davis, The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 275–282). Routledge.
Chataika, T., & Goodley, D. (Eds.). (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Disability Studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003310709
Connell, R. (2007). The Northern Theory of Globalization. Sociological Theory, 25(4), 368–385.
Padilla, A, Anand, S., Nair, J., & Nguyen, X. T. (2023). Developing decolonial partnerships with disability communities in the Global South: Perspectives from the South [Decolonial Disability Studies Collective (DDSC) webinar].
Erevelles, N. (2014). Thinking With Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i2.4248
Erevelles, N., & Abay, R. A. (2024). Racialised and gendered ableism: The epistemic erasure and epistemic labour of disability in transnational contexts. In R. Afeworki Abay and K. Soldatic (Eds.), Intersectional colonialities: Embodied colonial violence and practices of resistance at the axis of disability, race, Indigeneity, class, and gender (pp. 24-53). Routledge.
Erevelles, N., & Nguyen, X. T. (2016). Disability, girlhood, and vulnerability in transnational contexts. Girlhood Studies, 9(1), 3–20.
Fritsch, K. (2016). Blood Functions: Disability, Biosociality, and Facts of the Body. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 10(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2016.28
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972-997.
Grech, S. (2015). Decolonising Eurocentric disability studies: Why colonialism matters in the disability and global South debate. Social Identities, 21(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995347
Hale, C. R. (2006). Activist research v. cultural critique: Indigenous land rights and the contradictions of politically engaged anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 21(1), 96-120.
Leonardo, Z., & Broderick, A. A. (2011). Smartness as Property: A Critical Exploration of Intersections Between Whiteness and Disability Studies. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2206–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301008
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 240-270.
Mignolo, WalterD. (2007). Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2/3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498
Minich, J. A. (2014). Accessible citizenships: Disability, nation, and the cultural politics of greater Mexico. Temple University Press.
Minich, J. A. (2023). Radical Health: Unwellness, Care, and Latinx Expressive Culture. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478027393
Nguyen, X. T. (2018). Critical Disability Studies at the Edge of Global Development: Why Do We Need to Engage with Southern Theory? Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v7i1.400
Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822372530
Puar, J. (2023). Critical disability studies and the question of Palestine: Towards decolonizing disability. In Chen, M. Y., Kafer, A., Kim, E., & Avril Minich, J. (Eds). Crip genealogies (p. 117 - 134). Duke University Press.
Reed-Sandoval, A., & Sirvent, R. (2019). Editorial: Disability and the Decolonial Turn: Perspectives from the Americas. Disability and the Global South, 6(1), 1553–1561.
Samuels, E. (2017). Six Ways of Looking at Crip Time. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5824
Santos, B. de S. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002000
Speed, S. (2006). At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 66-76.
Anand, S. (2022). Advertising as Activism: Exploring an Aesthetics of Debility in Kashmiri Human Rights Campaigns. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 16(4), 457-474. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/870825.
Annamma, S. A. (2018). The pedagogy of pathologization: Dis/abled girls of color in the school-prison nexus. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315523057
Annamma, S., & Morrison, D. (2018). DisCrit Classroom Ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.008
AP News. (2024, May 6). Israel begins military operation in Rafah, hours after Hamas agrees to a cease-fire. AP News. https://apnews.com/live/cease-fire-israel-hamas-updates
Bell, C. (2006). Introducing white disability studies: A modest proposal. In L. J. Davis, The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 275–282). Routledge.
Chataika, T., & Goodley, D. (Eds.). (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Disability Studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003310709
Connell, R. (2007). The Northern Theory of Globalization. Sociological Theory, 25(4), 368–385.
Padilla, A, Anand, S., Nair, J., & Nguyen, X. T. (2023). Developing decolonial partnerships with disability communities in the Global South: Perspectives from the South [Decolonial Disability Studies Collective (DDSC) webinar].
Erevelles, N. (2014). Thinking With Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i2.4248
Erevelles, N., & Abay, R. A. (2024). Racialised and gendered ableism: The epistemic erasure and epistemic labour of disability in transnational contexts. In R. Afeworki Abay and K. Soldatic (Eds.), Intersectional colonialities: Embodied colonial violence and practices of resistance at the axis of disability, race, Indigeneity, class, and gender (pp. 24-53). Routledge.
Erevelles, N., & Nguyen, X. T. (2016). Disability, girlhood, and vulnerability in transnational contexts. Girlhood Studies, 9(1), 3–20.
Fritsch, K. (2016). Blood Functions: Disability, Biosociality, and Facts of the Body. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 10(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2016.28
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972-997.
Grech, S. (2015). Decolonising Eurocentric disability studies: Why colonialism matters in the disability and global South debate. Social Identities, 21(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995347
Hale, C. R. (2006). Activist research v. cultural critique: Indigenous land rights and the contradictions of politically engaged anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 21(1), 96-120.
Leonardo, Z., & Broderick, A. A. (2011). Smartness as Property: A Critical Exploration of Intersections Between Whiteness and Disability Studies. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2206–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301008
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 240-270.
Mignolo, WalterD. (2007). Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2/3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498
Minich, J. A. (2014). Accessible citizenships: Disability, nation, and the cultural politics of greater Mexico. Temple University Press.
Minich, J. A. (2023). Radical Health: Unwellness, Care, and Latinx Expressive Culture. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478027393
Nguyen, X. T. (2018). Critical Disability Studies at the Edge of Global Development: Why Do We Need to Engage with Southern Theory? Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v7i1.400
Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822372530
Puar, J. (2023). Critical disability studies and the question of Palestine: Towards decolonizing disability. In Chen, M. Y., Kafer, A., Kim, E., & Avril Minich, J. (Eds). Crip genealogies (p. 117 - 134). Duke University Press.
Reed-Sandoval, A., & Sirvent, R. (2019). Editorial: Disability and the Decolonial Turn: Perspectives from the Americas. Disability and the Global South, 6(1), 1553–1561.
Samuels, E. (2017). Six Ways of Looking at Crip Time. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5824
Santos, B. de S. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002000
Speed, S. (2006). At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 66-76.