Social Entrepreneurs and NGOs for People with Mental Disabilities in Post-Communist Europe: Implications for International Policy
Main Article Content
Keywords
Postcommunist, Disability NGO, Social Eutrepreneur, Disability Policy
Abstract
Disability activists and disability non-governmental organization (NGO) leaders in post-communist Central Europe have been among the most instrumental force for promoting disability rights and community-based living initiatives in their formerly communist countries. During an on-going period of massive economic and political transition, these disability activists and NGO leaders managed to take advantage of emerging civil society freedoms and have established innovative models for the promotion of disability issues throughout the post-communist region. Of particular note are those initiatives that have addressed the needs of people with mental disabilities. The use of the term “mental disabilities” in this article refers to a diverse group of people who share the common experience of institutionalization due to perceived differences in emotion, perception, and/or cognition and who have faced longstanding barriers to community living in communist and post-communist Europe. The following article describes the national and historical contexts for people with mental disabilities in the Visegrad Four countries of Central Europe: Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. It then highlights a number of innovative disability NGOs that are promoting human rights and community living for people with mental disabilities in each country. Implications for international collaboration with disability NGOs, and the importance of international disability policies, are discussed.
References
Black, E. (2004). War against the weak: Eugenics and America’s campaign to create a master race. New York: Thunders Mouth Press.
Brunwasser, M. (2009, January 5). In Eastern Europe, lives languish in mental facilities. The New York Times, p. A7.
Chappell, A. L. (1998). Still out in the cold: People with learning difficulties and the social model of disability. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 211-220). London: Cassell Publishers.
Deacon, B. (2000). Eastern European welfare states: The impact of the politics of globalization. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(2), 146-161.
Disability Rights Advocates. (2001). Invisible and neglected: Status of the human rights of people with disabilities in Central Europe. Oakland, CA: Disability Rights Advocates.
Fabrega, H. (1991). The culture and history of psychiatric stigma in early modern and modern western societies: A review of recent literature. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 32(2), 97-119.
Fajth, G. (2000). Social security in a rapidly changing environment: The case of the post-communist transformation. In N. Manning & I. Shaw (Eds.), New risks, new welfare: Signposts for social policy. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
Frankland, E. (2004). Nationalist entrepreneurialism in post-communist Slovakia: The Meciar Effect on Slovak nationalism. Conference Papers: Southern Political Science Association, 2004 Annual Meeting, USA, A, 1-52.
From Visegrad to Mitteleuropa (2005, April 14). The Economist 375(8422), 45. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/3871275
Gerner, K. (1999). A moveable place with a moveable past: Perspectives on Central Europe. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 45(1), 3-19.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
Gostin, L. O., & Gable, L. (2004). The human rights of persons with mental disabilities: A global perspective on the application of human rights principles to mental health. Maryland Law Review, 63, 20-121.
Harangozo, J., Dome, P., & Kristof, R. (2005). Service-related needs and opinions of people with schizophrenia in Hungary. Psychiatric Services, 56(6), 754-755.
Haug, H. J., & Rossler, W. (1999). Deinstitutionalization of psychiatric patients in central Europe. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 249, 115-122.
Havel, V. (1990). The power of the powerless: Citizens against the state in Central-Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Havel, V. (1991). Disturbing the peace: A conversation with Karel Huizdala. New York: Vintage.
Holland, D. (2003). Grassroots promotion of community health and human rights for people with disabilities in post-communist Europe: A profile of the Slovak Republic. Disability and Society, 18(2), 133-143.
Holland, D. (2008). The current status of disability activism and NGO's in post communist Europe: Preliminary findings based on reports from the field. Disability and Society, 28, 543-555.
Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (1998). Abandoned to the state: Cruelty and neglect in Russian orphanages. New York: Author.
Iarskia-Smirnova, E. (1999). What the future will bring I do not know: Mothering children with disabilities in Russia and the politics of exclusion. Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(2), 68-86.
Inclusion Europe. (2002). Human rights of persons with intellectual disability: Country report on Czech Republic. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
Jenkins, R., Klein, J., & Parker, C. (2005). Mental health in post-communist Europe: The results of demonstration projects now need implementing. British Medical Journal, 331, 173.
Jenkins, R., Tomov, T., Puras, D., Nanishvili, G., Sherardze, M., Surguladze, S., et al. (2001). Mental health reform in Eastern Europe. EuroHealth, 7, 15-21.
Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil society and accountability. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 5-27.
Karklins, R. (2000). Ethnopluralism: Panacea for East Central Europe? Nationalities Papers, 28(2), 219-241.
Kennedy, K. (2004). Speak truth to power: Human rights defenders who are changing our world. New York: Umbrage Editions.
Krosnar, K. (2006, July 10). Czech government to be sued over cage bed death. Lancet, 367(9526), 1889.
Kundera, M. (1984). A kidnapped Occident. New York Review of Books, 31(7).
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mental Disability Advocacy Centre. (2007, August 23). Czech Republic: Arbitrary detention in psychiatric institutions continues [Media Release]. Brno, Czech Republic: Author.
Mental Disability Rights International. (1997). Human rights and mental health: Hungary. Washington, DC: Author.
Mental Disability Rights International. (1999). Children in Russia’s institutions: Human rights and opportunities for reform. Washington, DC: Author.
Morel, B. A. (1857). Traite des degenerescences physiques, intellectuelles et morales de I'espece humaine [Characteristics of the physical, intellectual, and moral decline of the human species]. Paris: Baillière.
Myant, M. (2005). Klaus, Havel, and the debate over civil society in the Czech Republic. Journal of Communist Studies & Transition Politics, 21(2), 248-267.
National Council on Disability. (2003). Foreign policy and disability: Legislative strategies and civil rights protectors to ensure inclusion of people with disabilities. Retrieved from
http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/testimony/martinez_9-09-03.html
Nodia, G. (1996). How different are postcommunist transitions? Journal of Democracy, 7(4), 15-30.
Orlwska, D. (1991). Residential care for people with learning difficulties in Poland: A view from a visitor. Disability and Society, 6(2), 129-137.
Parmenter, T. R. (2001). Intellectual disabilities-quo vadis? In G.L. Albrecht, K.D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.). Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rosenthal, E., Okin, R., Bauer, E. W., Burnim, I., Dinerstein, R., Bakos, A., et al. (1997). Human rights and mental health: Hungary. Washington, DC: Mental Disability Rights International.
Rupnik, J. (2002). The international context. In L. Diamond & M.F. Plattner (Eds.), Democracy after communism (pp. 132-146). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Scott-Hill, M. (2002). Policy, politics and the silencing of the “voice.” Policy and Politics, 30(3), 397-409.
Secretariat of the African Decade of Persons with Disabilities. (2007). Human rights Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: AK Dube.
Sinecka, J. (2009). The Czech Republic: Report on the current state of disability law and policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19(4), 195-203.
Siska, J. (2006). A new movement in an old bureaucracy: The development of self-advocacy in the Czech Republic. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3), 146-150.
Stojaspal, J. (2004, September 30). Rage against the cage. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,703543,00.html
Subrt, J., & Dolezal, M. (2004, February 4). Milosz: Optimistic catastrophist. Transitions Online. Retrieved from http://www.tol.org/client/article/11544-milosz-optimistic-catastrophist.html
Tobis, D. (2001). Moving from residential institutions to community-based social services in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
UNICEF. (1997). Children at Risk in Central and Eastern Europe: Perils and Promises. (Regional monitoring report number 4). Florence, Italy: International Child Development Center.
United Nations. (2003). International Norms and Standards Relating to Disability. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations.
USAID. (2003). Third Report on Implementation of USAID Disability Policy. Retrieved from http://www.usaid.gov/about_usaid/disability/
Vermeersch, P. (2002). Ethnic mobilization and the political conditionality of European Union accession: The case of the Roma in Slovakia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 83-101.
White, S. (2003). Rethinking postcommunist transition. Government & Opposition, 38(4), 417-436.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
RDS Journal is an open-access journal, create a free account to read full articles and to submit a proposal. For visual arts and multimedia, submission will be considered evidence that you are offering RDS the right to display your work without penalty, compensation or royalties.
Daniel Holland, Director, Neurobehavior Center of Minnesota.
Daniel Holland, Ph.D., MPH is a clinical neuropsychologist who has been active in disability issues and disability policy. He was a Fulbright Senior Fellow in Eastern Europe (2002) and a Fulbright Senior Specialist in Austria (2004). He was a Fellow of the Asch Center for Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict at the University of Pennsylvania (2003), and a Research Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center (2005). In 2006, he was a Mary E. Switzer Distinguished Fellow in Rehabilitation Research with the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. He was formerly a rehabilitation neuropsychologist in the Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center of the Minneapolis VA Medical Center. He is currently Director of the Neurobehavior Center of Minnesota.