Editorial: Special Issue on Global South and Disability

Main Article Content

Xuan Thuy Nguyen
Shilpaa Anand
Alexis Padilla

Keywords

disability, global south

Abstract

This editorial provides an overview of the Special Issue: Global South and Disability and outlines its purpose and the content of the issue.

Abstract 39 | WORD Downloads 8 PDF Downloads 29

References

Abay, R. A., & Soldatic, K. (2024). Intersectional colonialities: Embodied colonial violence and practices of resistance at the axis of disability, race, indigeneity, class, and gender. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003280422
Anand, S. (2022). Advertising as Activism: Exploring an Aesthetics of Debility in Kashmiri Human Rights Campaigns. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 16(4), 457-474. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/870825.
Annamma, S. A. (2018). The pedagogy of pathologization: Dis/abled girls of color in the school-prison nexus. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315523057
Annamma, S., & Morrison, D. (2018). DisCrit Classroom Ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.008
AP News. (2024, May 6). Israel begins military operation in Rafah, hours after Hamas agrees to a cease-fire. AP News. https://apnews.com/live/cease-fire-israel-hamas-updates
Bell, C. (2006). Introducing white disability studies: A modest proposal. In L. J. Davis, The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 275–282). Routledge.
Chataika, T., & Goodley, D. (Eds.). (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Disability Studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003310709
Connell, R. (2007). The Northern Theory of Globalization. Sociological Theory, 25(4), 368–385.
Padilla, A, Anand, S., Nair, J., & Nguyen, X. T. (2023). Developing decolonial partnerships with disability communities in the Global South: Perspectives from the South [Decolonial Disability Studies Collective (DDSC) webinar].
Erevelles, N. (2014). Thinking With Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i2.4248
Erevelles, N., & Abay, R. A. (2024). Racialised and gendered ableism: The epistemic erasure and epistemic labour of disability in transnational contexts. In R. Afeworki Abay and K. Soldatic (Eds.), Intersectional colonialities: Embodied colonial violence and practices of resistance at the axis of disability, race, Indigeneity, class, and gender (pp. 24-53). Routledge.
Erevelles, N., & Nguyen, X. T. (2016). Disability, girlhood, and vulnerability in transnational contexts. Girlhood Studies, 9(1), 3–20.
Fritsch, K. (2016). Blood Functions: Disability, Biosociality, and Facts of the Body. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 10(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2016.28
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972-997.
Grech, S. (2015). Decolonising Eurocentric disability studies: Why colonialism matters in the disability and global South debate. Social Identities, 21(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995347
Hale, C. R. (2006). Activist research v. cultural critique: Indigenous land rights and the contradictions of politically engaged anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 21(1), 96-120.
Leonardo, Z., & Broderick, A. A. (2011). Smartness as Property: A Critical Exploration of Intersections Between Whiteness and Disability Studies. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2206–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301008
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 240-270.
Mignolo, WalterD. (2007). Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2/3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498
Minich, J. A. (2014). Accessible citizenships: Disability, nation, and the cultural politics of greater Mexico. Temple University Press.
Minich, J. A. (2023). Radical Health: Unwellness, Care, and Latinx Expressive Culture. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478027393
Nguyen, X. T. (2018). Critical Disability Studies at the Edge of Global Development: Why Do We Need to Engage with Southern Theory? Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v7i1.400
Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822372530
Puar, J. (2023). Critical disability studies and the question of Palestine: Towards decolonizing disability. In Chen, M. Y., Kafer, A., Kim, E., & Avril Minich, J. (Eds). Crip genealogies (p. 117 - 134). Duke University Press.
Reed-Sandoval, A., & Sirvent, R. (2019). Editorial: Disability and the Decolonial Turn: Perspectives from the Americas. Disability and the Global South, 6(1), 1553–1561.
Samuels, E. (2017). Six Ways of Looking at Crip Time. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5824
Santos, B. de S. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002000
Speed, S. (2006). At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 66-76.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.