Socially Equitable Community Planning: Including Individuals with Disabilities in the Democratic Association of Place
Main Article Content
Keywords
equality, community, planning
Abstract
Individuals with disabilities need opportunities for socially equitable association, where interactions are not premised on relational social qualifications, to realize community membership. Communities of location, defined by “place” rather than “people,” are a mechanism to avoid and an avenue to address the relational boundaries of communities of organization and culture for individuals with disabilities. The democratic associations of place supported by communities of location may be a significant factor in individuals with disabilities gaining membership in other types of social communities and being equal members of the community.
References
Bachrach, K. M., & Zautra, A. J. (1985). Coping with a community stressor: The threat of a hazardous waste facility. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 127-141.
Bostock, L., & Gleeson, B. (2004). Contested housing landscapes? Social inclusion, deinstitutionalization and housing policy in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39(1), 41-62.
Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2003). Community integration or community exposure? A review and discussion in relation to people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 145-157.
Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(3), 288-301.
Dear, M., Wilton R., Gaber S. L., & Takahashi, L. (1997). Seeing people differently: the sociospatial construction of disability. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(4), 455-480.
Hahn, H. (1985). Disability policy and the problem of discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, (28)3, 293-318.
Lynch, K., & Hack, G. (1984). Site planning. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Meyers, F., Ager, A., Kerr, P., & Myles, S. (1998). Outside looking in? Studies of the community integration of people with learning disabilities. Disability and Society, 13, 389-413.
Oldenburg, R., & Brissett, D. (1980). The essential hangout. Psychology Today, pp. 82-84.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect 4(13), 35-42.
Salzberg, C. L., & Langford, C. A. (1981). Community integration of mentally retarded adults through leisure activity. Mental Retardation, 19, 127-131.
So, F. S., & Getzels, J. (1988). The practice of local government planning. Washington, DC: . International City/County Management Association (ICMA).
Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1986). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Tropman, J. E., Erlich, J. L., & Rothman, J. (2006). Tactics and techniques of community intervention. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
Ware, N. C., Hopper, K., Tugenberg, T., Dickey, B., & Fisher, D. (2007). Connectedness and citizenship: Redefining social integration. Psychiatric Services, 58(4), 469-474.
Wilton, R. D. (1998). The constitution of difference: Space and psyche in landscapes of exclusion. Geoforum, 29(2), 173-185.
Wolfensberger, W. (2000). A brief overview of social role valorization. Mental Retardation, 38(2), 105-123.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
RDS Journal is an open-access journal, create a free account to read full articles and to submit a proposal. For visual arts and multimedia, submission will be considered evidence that you are offering RDS the right to display your work without penalty, compensation or royalties.
Keith Christensen, Assistant Professor, Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning; Senior Research Scientist, Center for Persons with Disabilities, Utah State University
Keith Christensen, MLA, is an assistant professor in the Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, and a senior research scientist with the Center for Persons with Disabilities, at Utah State University. Keith’s research emphasizes the planning and design of socially inclusive environments.