Inclusive Education in the United States and Internationally: Challenges and Response

Main Article Content

Mark C. Weber

Keywords

special education, disability studies, inclusion

Abstract

Achieving inclusion of children with disabilities in general education remains a challenge.  This article discusses United States and international legal developments and relates educational inclusion to controversies within the disability studies movement.  It considers questions that have been raised about integrated education and concludes that inclusion should remain the goal, but that more attention must be devoted to making educational inclusion work.

Abstract 280 | PDF Downloads 122 Word Downloads 10 Text Downloads 31

References

Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (2007). International convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations.

Americans with Disabilities Act, title II, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 121131-12150 (2006).

Americans with Disabilities Act Regulations, title II, 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.102-.178 (2006).

Bagenstos, S. R. (2004). The Future of Disability Law, Yale Law Journal, 114, 1-83.

Baird v. Rose, 192 F.3d 462 (1999).

Beattie v. Bd. of Educ., 172 N.W. 153 (Wis. 1919).

Belkin, L. (2004, September 12). The lessons of classroom 506: What happens when a boy with cerebral palsy goes to kindergarten like all the other kids. New York Times Magazine, 41-49, 62, 104

Beth B. v. Van Clay, 282 F.3d 493 (7th Cir. 2002).

Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Burch, S. (2002). Signs of resistance: American deaf cultural history, 1900 to 1942. New York: NYU Press.

Burlington Sch. Comm. v. Dep’t of Educ., 471 U.S. 359 (1985).

Campbell v. Talladega County Board of Education, 518 F. Supp. 47 (1981).

Cleary, E. (1959). Presuming and pleading: An essay on juristic immaturity. Stanford Law Review, 12, 5-28.

Cook, S., & Slee, R., (1999). Struggling with the fabric of disablement: Picking up the threads of law and education, in M. Jones & L. A. Basser Marks (Eds.), Disability, divers-ability, and legal change. The Hague, Neth.: Martinus Nijhoff.

Cook, T. M. (1991). The Americans with Disabilities Act: The move to integration. Temple Law Review, 64, 393-469.

Colker, R. (2006). The disability integration presumption: Thirty years later. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154, 789-862.

Corey H. v. Bd. of Educ., 995 F. Supp. 900 (N.D. Ill. 1998).

Cover, R. (1983). The supreme court, 1982 term–foreword, nomos and narrative, Harvard Law Review, 97, 4-68.

Daniel R.R. v. State Bd. of Educ., 874 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).

Davidson, M. (2002). Hearing things: The scandal of speech in deaf performance. In S. Snyder, B. Brueggemann, & R. Garland-Thomson (Eds.), Disability studies: Enabling the humanities. New York: Modern Language Assn.

Davis, L. (2002). Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism, and other difficult positions. New York: NYU Press.

Degener, T., & Quinn, G. (2002). A survey of international, comparative, and regional disability law reform. Retrieved May 27, 2005, from http://www.dredf.org/international/degener_quinn.html

DeVries v. Fairfax County Sch. Bd., 882 F.2d 876 (4th Cir. 1989).

Eaton v. Brant County Bd. of Educ., 1 S.C.R. 241 (1997).

Fox, C. L. (1989). Peer acceptance of learning disabled children in the regular classroom. Exceptional Children, 56, 50-59.

Garda, R. (2004). Untangling eligibility requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Missouri Law Review, 60, 441-512.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Gross, J. (2005, February 26). As autistic children grow, so does social gap. New York Times, A1, A8.

Hahn, H. (1997). Advertising the acceptably employable image. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 1400-1487 (2006).

Johnson, M. (2003). Make them go away: Clint Eastwood, Christopher Reeve & the case against disability rights. Louisville, KY: Advocado Press.

L.B. v. Nebo Sch. Dist., 379 F.3d 966 (10th Cir. 2004).

Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability. New York: NYU Press.

M.L. v. Fed. Way Sch. Dist., 394 F.3d 634 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 2941 (2005).

Mills v. Bd. of Educ., 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972).

Minow, M. (1990). Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Univ. Press.

Oberti v. Bd. of Educ., 995 F.2d 1204 (3d Cir. 1993).

O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975).

Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581(1999).

Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429 (1984).

PARC v. Pa., 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972).

President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Rehabilitation Act, section 504, 29 U.S.C.A. § 794 (2006).

Reid L. v. Ill. State Bd. of Educ., 289 F.3d 1009 (7th Cir. 2002).

Roncker v. Walter, 700 F.2d 1058 (6th Cir. 1983).

Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist. v. Rachel H., 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994).

The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action (1994). New York: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Sch. Dist. v. Z.S., 295 F.3d 671 (7th Cir. 2002).

Scotch, R. (2001). From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.

Section 504 Regulations, 29 C.F.R. §§ 32.1-.28 (2004).

Sheffler, B. (1981). Education of handicapped children. St. John’s Law Review, 56, 81-113.

Strengthening and Improvement of Elementary and Secondary Schools Act, 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 6301-6322 (West 2006).

tenBroek, J., & Matson, F. W. (1966). The disabled and the law of welfare. California Law Review, 54, 809-840.

Weber, M. C. (2000). Disability and the law of welfare: A post-integrationist examination. University of Illinois Law Review, 889-956.

Weber, M. C. (2001). The least restrictive environment obligation as an entitlement to educational services: A commentary. U.C.-Davis Journal of Juvenile Law and Policy, 5, 147-158.

Weber, M. C. (2002). Disability harassment in the public schools. William and Mary Law Review, 43, 1079-1158.

Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982).