Promising Interventions for Promoting STEM Fields to Students Who Have Disabilities
Main Article Content
Keywords
technology, transition, self-determination
Abstract
This study compared two groups of transition program participants—those with reported strengths and career goals in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) and those without—regarding their characteristics and perceptions of the social, academic, and career benefits of program interventions. Consistent with previous research on gender and STEM, more males than females reported strengths and goals in STEM. Results suggest that type of disability may play a role in the perception of STEM fields as career options, perhaps resulting in less interest in these fields on the part of students with mobility/orthopedic impairments. While the STEM group expressed more interest in technology-related activities, non-STEM participants consistently rated themselves higher in self-advocacy skills and perceived that program participation improved their social skills more than did STEM participants. Regarding motivation to attend college, academic interest and love of learning/challenges was cited more often by members of the STEM group, while job/career preparation was identified by more of the non-STEM students. As far as motivation for employment, financial security was selected by significantly more of the STEM-oriented participants and pursuit of independent living was chosen by more of the non-STEM participants. Results suggest that program interventions may help change college study and career plans of those who do not initially have STEM interests. Based on the responses of the two groups in this study, the authors make program recommendations for increasing the representation of people with disabilities in STEM fields.
References
Benz, R. B., Yavonoff, P., & Doren, B. (1997). School-to-work components that predict post school success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 151–165.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal post school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
Burgstahler, S. (2001). A collaborative model promotes career success for students with disabilities: How DO-IT does it. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16 (129), 1–7.
Burgstahler, S. (2002). The value of DO-IT to kids who did it! Exceptional Parent, 32(11), 79–86.
Burgstahler, S. (2003). DO-IT: Helping students with disabilities transition to college and careers. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Research to Practice Brief, 2(3).
Burgstahler, S., Bellman, S., & Lopez, S. (2004). Research to practice: DO-IT prepares students with disabilities for employment. NACE Journal, 65(1). Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.naceweb.org/FormsLogin.asp?/pubs/journal/fa04/bellman.htm
Burgstahler, S., & Cronheim, D. (2001). Supporting peer-peer and mentor-protégé relationships on the Internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 59–74.
Burgstahler, S., & Doyle, A. (2005). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication among adolescents with disabilities: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics case study. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(2). Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.dsq-sds.org/2005_spring_toc.html
Butterworth, J., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (1997). Employees with disabilities: What managers, supervisors, and co-workers have to say. Employment in the Mainstream, 22, 5–15.
Cavanagh, S. (2006, June 7). NAEP scores show fewer budding scientists. Education Week 25(39), 5, 16.
Chinn, P. (1999). Multiple worlds and mis-matched meanings: Barriers to minority women engineers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 621–636.
Cohen, K. J., & Light, J. C. (2000). Use of electronic communication to develop mentor-protégé relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: Pilot study. AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 227–238.
Cunningham, A., Redmond, C., & Merisotis, J. (2003). Investing early: Intervention programs in selected U.S. states. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.millenniumscholarships.ca/images/Publications/investingeng_web2.pdf
DO-IT. (n.d.), Search the AccessSTEM Knowledge Base. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.washington.edu/doit/Stem/kb.html
DO-IT. (2006). DO-IT Scholars. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Programs/scholars.html
Doren, B., & Benz, M. R. (1998). Employment inequity revisited: Predictors of better employment outcomes of young women with disabilities in transition. Journal of Special Education, 31(4), 425–442.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment: Effects on achievement motivation.” In J. F. Nicholls (Ed.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement: The Development of Achievement Motivation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Fisher, S. (2000). Towson University Outreach. Towson, MD: Towson University. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/sped/tri/towsonuniversity.htm
Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944.
Kaye, H. S. (2000). Computer and Internet use among people with disabilities. Disability Statistic Report 13. San Francisco, CA: University of California, Disability Statistics Center.
Kim-Rupnow, W. S., & Burgstahler, S. (2004). Perceptions of students with disabilities regarding the value of technology-based support activities on postsecondary education and employment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 43–56. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://jset.unlv.edu/19.2/rupnow/first.html
Kohler, P. D., & Chapman, S. (1999). Literature review on school-to-work transition. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Transition Research Institute. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/sped/tri/2stwresearch.htm
Kohler, P. D., & Hood, L. K. (2000). Improving student outcomes: Promising practices and programs for 1999–2000. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Transition Research Institute.
Kohler, P. D., & Troesken, B. J. (1999). Improving student outcomes: Promising practices and programs for 1998–1999. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Transition Research Institute.
Malcom, S. M., & Matyas, M. L. (Eds.). (1991). Investing in human potential: Science and engineering at the crossroads. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
National Council on Disability and Social Security Administration. (2000). Transition and post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities: Closing the gaps to post-secondary education and employment. Washington, DC: Author.
National Organization on Disability. (2004). Harris 2004 Survey of Americans with Disabilities. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.nod.org/Resources/harris2004/harris2004_pres.pdf
National Science Foundation. (2002). NSF’s program for gender equity in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: A brief retrospective 1993 -2001 (NSF Publication No. 02-107). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02107/nsf02107.pdf
National Science Foundation. (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF Publication No. 04-317). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/nsf04317.pdf
National Science Foundation. (2005). Research in disabilities education (NSF Publication No. 05-23). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsf05623/nsf05623.htm Office of Disability Employment Policy. (2001, November). Improving the availability of community-based services for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
Simpkins, S. D. & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The intersection between self-concepts and values: Links between beliefs and choices in high school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 31-47.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70-83.
Skolnick, J., Langbort, C., & Day, L. (1982). How to encourage girls in math and science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Stainback, W., Stainback, S., & Wilkinson, A. (1992). Encouraging peer supports and friendships. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(2), 6–11.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2004). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2003-04 Edition, Computer System Analysts, Database Administrators, and Computer Scientists. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos258.htm.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., & Levine, P. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Zarrett, N. R., & Malanchuk, O. (2005). Who’s computing? Gender and race differences in young adults’ decisions to pursue an information technology career. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 65-84.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
RDS Journal is an open-access journal, create a free account to read full articles and to submit a proposal. For visual arts and multimedia, submission will be considered evidence that you are offering RDS the right to display your work without penalty, compensation or royalties.
Sheryl Burgstahler, Associate Professor, University of Washington in Seattle
Sheryl Burgstahler, Ph.D., is an Affiliate Associate Professor in the College of Education and the founder and director of DO-IT, the Alliance for Students with Disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (AccessSTEM), and Accessible Technology Services at the University of Washington in Seattle.