Introduction to the Special Issue: “Self-Determination” as a Social Construct: Cross-cultural Considerations

Main Article Content

David Leake
James Skouge

Keywords

self determination, disablity studies, Pacific islands

Abstract

This special issue of the Review of Disability Studies is meant to stimulate thinking and dialogue about how self-determination is conceived and promoted by and for people with disabilities, and how the concept and its application might be enhanced to better empower and improve the quality of life of people with disabilities around the world. We decided to devote time and effort to this topic because of our observations that self-determination as typically presented is not a good fit for cultural milieu in Hawaii and across the Pacific region. A likely reason for this lack of fit emerged as we read a large proportion of the many publications on self-determination and people with disabilities: the self-determination concept as typically defined is rooted in the individualistic values common to Western cultures, whereas most residents of Hawaii and other Pacific Islands come from collectivistic cultural backgrounds.

Abstract 175 | PDF Downloads 35 Word Downloads 11 Text Downloads 29

References

Bar-on, A. (1999). Social work and the missionary zeal to whip the heathen along the path of righteousness. British Journal of Social Work, 29, 5-26.

Biestek, F. P., & Gehrig, C. C. (1978). Client self-determination in social work: A fifty-year history. Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press.

Black, R. S., & Leake, D.W. (2011). Teachers’ views of self-determination for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: The limitations of an individualistic perspective. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 147-161. Available at http://www.internationaljournalofspecialeducation.com/issues.cfm

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

Ejaz, F. K. (1991). Self-determination: Lessons to be learned from social work practice in India. British Journal of Social Work, 21, 127–142.

Ewalt, P. L., & Mokuau, N. (1995). Self-determination from a Pacific perspective. Social Work, 40(2), 168–175.

Falck, H. S. (1988). Social work: The membership perspective. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

Fleischer, D. Z., & Zames, F. (2001). The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Frankland, H. C., Turnbull, A. P., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Blackmountain, L. (2004). An exploration of the self-determination construct and disability as it relates to the Dine´ (Navajo) culture. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(3), 191–205.

Furlong, M. S. (2003). Self determination and a critical perspective in casework: Promoting a balance between interdependence and autonomy. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 177-196.

Gair, S., Miles, D. & Thomson, J. (2005). Reconciling indigenous and non-indigenous knowledges in social work education: Action and legitimacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(2), 179-190.

Geenen, S. Powers, L., Vasquez, A. L., & Bersani, H. (2003). Understanding and promoting the transition of minority adolescents. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26(1), 27-46.

Nirje, B. (1972). The right to self-determination. In W. Wolfensberger (Ed.), Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services (pp. 176-200). Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.

Ward, M. J. & Kohler, P. D. (1996). Promoting self-determination for individuals with disabilities: Content and process. In L. E. Powers, G. H. S. Singer, & J. Sowers (Eds.), Making our way: Building self-competence among children with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.