Main Article Content
policy, legitimacy, values
In this paper we present and apply Legitimacy Policy, a framework for policy analysis that applies a legitimacy lens to the examination, understanding, and illumination of directions for purposive policy change. Interrogating historical and current disability policy: (a) reveals the context-based value-foundations and continued dominance of medical explanations of disability inherent in disability-specific policy and (b) maps a direction for policy change that can advance human rights for disabled citizens.
Barnartt, S. N., & Scotch, R. K. (2001). Disability protests: Contentious politics, 1970-1999. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Berkowitz, E. D. (1989). Disabled policy: America’s programs for the handicapped: A twentieth century fund report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DePoy, E. & Gilson, S. F. (2008). The human experience: An Explanatory Legitimacy approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. F. (2004). Rethinking disability: Principles for professional and social change. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Jaeger, P. T. & Bowman, C.A. (2005) Understanding disability: Inclusion, access, diversity, and civil rights. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Lembcke, O. W. (2007). From belief to obedience: Max Weber on legitimacy and legality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Berlin, Germany.
Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970. Pub. L. No. 91-596, 84 Stat. 1590 (1970), as amended through January 1, 2004. Retrieved from the United States Department of Labor website http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=OSHACT&p_id=3355
Pelka, F. (1997). ABC Clio companion to the disability rights movement. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio.
Scotch, R. K. (2001). From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Scully, J. L. (2008). Disability Bioethics. Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield.
Smart, J. (2001). Disability, society, and the individual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Stein, M. D. (2006). Distributive justice and disability: Utilitarianism against egalitarianism. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Stone, D. A. (2001). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2006a, March 15). Medicaid. Retrieved from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/home/medicaid.asp
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2006b, March 15). Medicare Coverage. Retrieved from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/center/coverage.asp
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. (2005). Entrance pass programs. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/fees_passes.htm
Wehman, P. (2000). Strategies for funding supported employment: A review of federal programs. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 179–182.
Zeldich, M. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In J. Jost and B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspective on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 33-55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (1999-2006). Universal Design for Learning. http://www.cast.org
The Center for Universal Design. (2006). Environments and products for all people. NC State University, The Center for Universal Design, College of Design. http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/
DePoy, E. (2004). Modular Long Term Care Modules. University of Maine, Center for Community Inclusion and Disability Studies. http://www.ccids.umaine.edu/hrsaltc/index.htm
Web Access Subcommittee, The University of Maine. (n.d.). Creating Accessible Websites. University of Maine. http://www.umaine.edu/insider/accessibility