The Crip, The Fat and The Ugly in an Age of Austerity: Resistance, Reclamation and Affirmation
Main Article Content
Disability, crip, queer, fat, ugly, reclamation
Welcome to this special forum, The Crip, The Fat and The Ugly in an Age of Austerity: Resistance, Reclamation and Affirmation. Our original desire in putting out this call was to critically explore the processes and politics of austerity upon diverse and marginalized embodiments in neoliberal and advanced capitalist times. Global austerity has a far reach, often into, around, behind, beyond and alongside the body. Global austerity routinely categorizes body-minds[i] in terms of productivity, value, cost, ability and aesthetics. Body-minds are positioned vis-a-vis global austerity as a site for social order, economic possibility, progression, and big business. Whereas “[a]n able body is the body of a citizen; deformed deafened, amputated, obese, female, perverse, crippled, maimed and blinded bodies do not make up the body politic” (Davis, 1995, pp. 71–72). In devising this forum, we yearned for space to contemplate the aesthetics, experiences and the reification of body-minds - how capitalism makes sense of and shapes body-minds; the ways in which austerity both marks and produces bodies and selves, and the means through which these are further shaped by disability, race, class, gender, age, size, sexuality, and nation. Although we explore aspects of these in our own work (Liddiard, 2018; Slater, 2015), we wanted to create a space to connect with others and think about diverse and marginalized embodiments in austere times. In this introduction, we story the process through which we put the issue together, from our original decision making and putting out the call, to supporting authors to revise their contributions. We do so because we feel it’s a fitting way to speak to the inclusions and exclusions made in this forum. At the same time, we feel it offers a broader commentary as to the “state” of global disability studies today.
Brandon, T., & Pritchard, G. (2011). “Being fat”: A conceptual analysis using three models of disability. Disability & Society, 26(1), 79–92. doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.529669
Brown, L. X. Z., Ashkenazy, E., & Onaiwu, M. G. (Eds.). (2017). All the weight of our dreams: On living racialized autism. Lincoln: DragonBee Press.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (10th Anniv). New York and London: Routledge.
Chataika, T. (Ed.). (2018). The routledge handbook of disability in Southern Africa. London: Routledge.
Clare, E. (1999). Exile and pride: Disability, queerness, and liberation. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Clare, E. (2017). Brilliant imperfection: Grappling with cure. Durham: Duke University Press.
Conrad, R. (2014). Against equality: Queer revolution not mere inclusion. Edinburgh and Oakland: AK Press.
Cooper, C. (1997). Can a fat woman call herself disabled?. Disability & Society, 12(1), 31–42. doi.org/10.1080/09687599727443
Cooper, C. (2016). Fat activism : A radical social movement. Bristol: HammerOn Press.
Davis, L. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London and New York: Verso.
Dowse, L. M. (2009). ‘Some people are never going to be able to do that’. Challenges for people with intellectual disability in the 21st century'. Disability and Society, 24(5), 571–584.
Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal, 14(3), 1–32.
Ghai, A. (2014). Rethinking disability in India. New Delhi: Routledge.
Grech, S. (2015). Disability and poverty in the Global South: Renegotiating development in Guatemala. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, M., & McRuer, R. (2014). Cripistemologies. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8(2), 127–148. doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2014.12
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Liddiard, K. (2018). The intimate lives of disabled people. Abingdon: Routledge.
McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory. New York: New York University Press.
Mingus, M. (2011). Moving toward the ugly: A politic beyond desirability. Leaving evidence. Retrieved from http://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/08/22/moving-toward-the-ugly-a-politic-beyond-desirability.
Rothblum, E., & Soloway, S. (Eds.). (2009). The fat studies reader. New York and London: New York University Press.
Sandahl, C. (2003). QUEERING THE CRIP OR CRIPPING THE QUEER? Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 9(1–2), 25–56.
Schaffzin, G. (n.d.). Reclaiming The Margins in The Face of The Quantified Self http://utopia-dystopia.com/#/ar-qs/
Schweik, S. M. (2009). The ugly laws: Disability in public. New York: New York University Press.
Siebers, T. (2010). The aesthetics of human disqualification. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Slater, J. (2015). Youth and disability: A challenge to Mr Reasonable. Interdisciplinary Disability Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
Soldatic, K., & Meekosha, H. (Eds.). (2014). The global politics of impairment and disability: Processes and embodiments. London: Routledge.