The Becoming Subject of Dementia
Main Article Content
Keywords
dementia, population aging, normalcy, personhood
Abstract
In this paper we analyse the becoming subject of dementia, as it is made to appear within the contexts of nation-building and everyday life. Insights yielded from this analysis suggest the importance of time to recognition of normalcy, and to the meaning of being a person.
References
Alzheimer’s Society of Ireland. (2012). National dementia strategy. Retrieved from http://www.alzheimer.ie/Get-Involved/Campaigning/National-Dementia-Strategy.aspx
Alzheimer Society Canada. (2010). Rising tide: The impact of dementia on Canadian society. Retrieved from http://www.alzheimer.ca/~/media/Files/national/Advocacy/ASC_Rising_Tide_Full_Report_e.pdf
Baars, J. (2006). Beyond neomodernism, antimodernism, and postmodernism: Basic categories for contemporary critical gerontology. In J. Baars, D. Dannefer, C. Phillipson & A. Walker (Eds.), Aging, globalization and inequality: The new critical gerontology (pp. 17-42). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Basting, A. (2008). Dementia and the performance of self. In C. Sandahl & P. Auslander (Eds.), Bodies in commotion: Disability & performance (pp. 202-214). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Boyle, G. (2014). Recognising the agency of people with dementia. Disability & Society, 29(7), 1130-1144.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
Burke, L. (2014a). Oneself as Another: Intersubjectivity and ethics in Alzheimer's illness narratives, Narrative Works, 4, 28-47
Burke, L. (2014b). The Alzheimer’s show. Theorising normalcy and the mundane: More questions of the human, 5th international conference. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England. Keynote Address.
Erevelles, N. (2014). Materializing normalcy at the intersections of difference: Theoretical impasses. Theorising normalcy and the mundane: More questions of the human, 5th international conference. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England. Keynote Address.
Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge.
Josline Diabetes Centre. (2008). The bathtub test. Retrieved from http://forums.joslin.org/JoslinDiscussionBoards/t/1508.aspx
Kitwood, T. (1997). Reconsidering dementia: The person comes first. Open University Press.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), pp. 11-40.
Moreira, T. & Bond, J. (2008). Does the prevention of brain ageing constitute anti-ageing medicine? Outline of a new space of representation for Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(4): 356-365
Mullan, P. (2002). The imaginary time bomb: Why an ageing population is not a social problem. London: I.B. Tauris.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Addressing dementia: The OECD Response. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/addressing-dementia-the-oecd-response.pdf
Prince, M., Bryce, R., Albanese, E., Wilmo, A., Ribeiro, W., & Cleusa, F. (2013). The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer’s and Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 9(1), 63-75.
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. K. Blamey (Trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rose, N. & Abi-Rached, J.M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sabat, S. (2008). Tikkun olam and people with Alzheimer’s disease: Emphasizing personhood, not patienthood. AJAS Journal on Jewish Aging, 1-9.
Simpson, J. (2014). Our hospitals are not ready for the grey tsunami. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/our-hospitals-are-not-ready-for-the-grey-tsunami/article19113784/
Taylor, C. (1985). The person. In M. Carrithers, S. Collins & S. Lukes (Eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history (pp. 257-281). Cambridge: New York.
Titchkosky, T. (2014). Monitoring disability: The question of the ‘human’ in human rights projects. In M. Gill and C. Schlund-Vials (Eds.), Disability, human rights and the limits of humanitarianism (pp. 119-136). London: Ashgate.
Titchkosky, T. & Aubrecht, K. (In Press). “One in five”: The prevalence problematic in mental illness discourse. In M. Morrow & L. Halinka Malcoe (Eds.), Critical inquiries: Theories and methodologies for social justice in mental health. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Turner, B. (1984). The body and society: Explorations in social theory. London: SAGE.
World Health Organization & Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2012). Dementia: A public health priority. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75263/1/9789241564458_eng.pdf
Alzheimer Society Canada. (2010). Rising tide: The impact of dementia on Canadian society. Retrieved from http://www.alzheimer.ca/~/media/Files/national/Advocacy/ASC_Rising_Tide_Full_Report_e.pdf
Baars, J. (2006). Beyond neomodernism, antimodernism, and postmodernism: Basic categories for contemporary critical gerontology. In J. Baars, D. Dannefer, C. Phillipson & A. Walker (Eds.), Aging, globalization and inequality: The new critical gerontology (pp. 17-42). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
Basting, A. (2008). Dementia and the performance of self. In C. Sandahl & P. Auslander (Eds.), Bodies in commotion: Disability & performance (pp. 202-214). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Boyle, G. (2014). Recognising the agency of people with dementia. Disability & Society, 29(7), 1130-1144.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
Burke, L. (2014a). Oneself as Another: Intersubjectivity and ethics in Alzheimer's illness narratives, Narrative Works, 4, 28-47
Burke, L. (2014b). The Alzheimer’s show. Theorising normalcy and the mundane: More questions of the human, 5th international conference. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England. Keynote Address.
Erevelles, N. (2014). Materializing normalcy at the intersections of difference: Theoretical impasses. Theorising normalcy and the mundane: More questions of the human, 5th international conference. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England. Keynote Address.
Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge.
Josline Diabetes Centre. (2008). The bathtub test. Retrieved from http://forums.joslin.org/JoslinDiscussionBoards/t/1508.aspx
Kitwood, T. (1997). Reconsidering dementia: The person comes first. Open University Press.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), pp. 11-40.
Moreira, T. & Bond, J. (2008). Does the prevention of brain ageing constitute anti-ageing medicine? Outline of a new space of representation for Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(4): 356-365
Mullan, P. (2002). The imaginary time bomb: Why an ageing population is not a social problem. London: I.B. Tauris.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Addressing dementia: The OECD Response. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/addressing-dementia-the-oecd-response.pdf
Prince, M., Bryce, R., Albanese, E., Wilmo, A., Ribeiro, W., & Cleusa, F. (2013). The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer’s and Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 9(1), 63-75.
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. K. Blamey (Trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rose, N. & Abi-Rached, J.M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sabat, S. (2008). Tikkun olam and people with Alzheimer’s disease: Emphasizing personhood, not patienthood. AJAS Journal on Jewish Aging, 1-9.
Simpson, J. (2014). Our hospitals are not ready for the grey tsunami. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/our-hospitals-are-not-ready-for-the-grey-tsunami/article19113784/
Taylor, C. (1985). The person. In M. Carrithers, S. Collins & S. Lukes (Eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history (pp. 257-281). Cambridge: New York.
Titchkosky, T. (2014). Monitoring disability: The question of the ‘human’ in human rights projects. In M. Gill and C. Schlund-Vials (Eds.), Disability, human rights and the limits of humanitarianism (pp. 119-136). London: Ashgate.
Titchkosky, T. & Aubrecht, K. (In Press). “One in five”: The prevalence problematic in mental illness discourse. In M. Morrow & L. Halinka Malcoe (Eds.), Critical inquiries: Theories and methodologies for social justice in mental health. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Turner, B. (1984). The body and society: Explorations in social theory. London: SAGE.
World Health Organization & Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2012). Dementia: A public health priority. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75263/1/9789241564458_eng.pdf