From Dialogue to Bakhtin’s Dialogue: A Critical Review in Learning Disability Research

Main Article Content

Waseem Mazher
Jong-Gu Kang


learning disability, dialogue, Bakhtinian


The purpose of this study was to understand the nature of dialogue used in peer-refereed research articles related to learning disabilities (LD) and instruction. We attempted to evaluate the quality of dialogue in these articles through a lens that Bakhtin and various disability studies scholars offer.  In addition, we suggest that disability scholars’ concepts and uses of dialogue provided a way for us to frame our Bakhtinian critique in the broader context of theorizing the social model of disability.  From a critical review of these articles, we identified various limitations in ways that dialogue is used to conduct the studies and also in the ways that dialogue is represented by the authors.  The studies often minimized the voices of the students labeled as LD.  We offer many suggestions for how to present their voices in research and how to improve teaching through conceptualizing learning in a different, more sensitive way as informed by Bakhtin’s notion of dialogue.

Abstract 264 | PDF Downloads 58 Word Downloads 29 Text Downloads 55


Allan, J. (1999). Actively seeking inclusion: Pupils with special needs in mainstream schools. London: Falmer Press.

Artiles, A. J. (2003). Special education’s changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in views of culture and space. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 164-202.

Bakhtin, M. (1968). Rabelais and his world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.

Carrier, G. (1986). Learning disability: Social class and the construction of inequality in American education. New York: Greenwood Press.

Clark, K., & Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Corker, M., & Shakespeare, T. (Eds.). (2002). Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory. London: Continuum.

Davis, L. L. (1997). Constructing normalcy. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 9-28). New York: Routledge.

Dewey, J. (1929). The sources of a science of education. New York: H. Liveright.

Dudley-Marling, C. (2004). The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 482-489.

Dudley-Marling, C., & Dippo, D. (1995). What learning disability does: Sustaining the ideology of schooling. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 406-414.

Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1996). A sociocultural perspective: Teaching ways of thinking and ways of talking in a literacy community. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(3), 157-67.

Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., & Mariage, T. V. (1994). Developing a school-based discourse for literacy learning: A principled search for understanding. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(1), 2-32.

Englert, C. S., Rozendal, M. S., & Mariage, M. (1994). Fostering the search for understanding: A teacher's strategies for leading cognitive development in "Zones of proximal development." Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(3), 187-204.

Englert, C. S., Tarrant, K. L., Mariage, T. V., & Oxer, T. (1995). The early literacy project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(4), 253-275.

Eskin, M. (2000). Ethics and dialogue in the works of Levinas, Bakhtin, Mandel’shtam, and Celan. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fleischer, D. Z., & Zames, F. (2001). The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: The archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1977). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977 (C.
Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13(3), 126-137.

Gallagher, D. J. (2003). All research is a story: On method, methodology, and disability inquiry.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Disability Studies, Bethesda,

Gallagher, D. J., Heshusius, L., Iano, R. P., & Skrtic, T. M. (2004). Challenging orthodoxy in
special education: Dissenting voices. Colorado: Love Publishing Company.

Garland-Thomson R. (1999). The new disability studies: Inclusion or tolerance? ADFL Bulletin,
31(1), 49-53.

Goodley, D., & Rapley, M. (2002). Changing the subject: Postmodernity and people with ‘learning difficulties.’ In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity (pp. 127-142). New York: Continuum.

Kudlick, C. (2003). Disability history: Why we need another "other." The American Historical Review, 108(3), 763-793.

Leshowitz, B., Jenkens, K., Heaton, S., & Bough, T. L. (1993). Fostering critical thinking skills in students with learning disabilities: An instructional program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(7), 483-490.

Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York University Press.

MacArthur, C. A. (1998). Word processing with speech synthesis and word prediction: Effects on the dialogue journal writing of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(2), 151-166.

Malouf, D. B., & Schiller, E. P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61(5), 414-424.

Mariage, T. V. (1995). Why students learn: The nature of teacher talk during reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(3), 214-234.

Mariage, T. V. (2001). Features of an interactive writing discourse: Conversational involvement, conventional knowledge, and internalization in "morning message." Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 34(2), 172-196.

Michalko, R. (2002). Estranged-familiarity. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity (pp. 175-183). New York: Continuum.

Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2000). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Moore, M., Beazley, S., & Maelzer, J. (1998). Researching disability issues. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Peters, J. (2002). Is there a disability culture? Disability and Society, 15(4), 583-601.

Reid, D. K. (1991). Individual differences in the self-image of adolescents with learning disabilities: The roles of severity, time of diagnosis, and parental perceptions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(2), 602-11, 629.

Reid, D. K., & Button, L. J. (1995). Anna’s story: Narratives of personal experience about being labeled learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(10), 602-614.

Reid, D. K., & Valle, J. (2004). The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent-school relations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 466-482.

Shakespeare, T. (1994). Cultural representations of disabled people. Disability and Society, 14(5), 283-299.

Shuttleworth, R. P. (2002). Defusing the adverse context of disability and desirability as a practice of the self for men with cerebral palsy. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity (pp. 112-126). New York: Continuum.

Smith, L. L., & Griffin, J. K. (2002). Conversations with delinquents: The mingling of meager dialogues: A pilot study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 53(4), 127-130.

Stanovich, P. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Research into practice in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), 477-481.

Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of learning disabilities. New York: The Guilford Press.

Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Valle, J. W., & Aponte, E. (2002). IDEA and collaboration: A Bakhtinian perspective on parent and professional discourses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5), 469-479.

Volosinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Walker, H. M., Forness, S. R., Kauffman, J., Epstein, M. H., Gresham, F. M., Nelso, C. M., et al. (1998). Macro-social validation: Referencing outcomes in behavioral disorders to societal issues and problems. Behavioral Disorders, 24(1), 7-18.

Wong, B. Y. L. (1997). Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 140-59.

Wong, B. (Ed.). (2004). Learning about learning disabilities. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.

Wong, B. Y. L., Butler, D. L., Ficzere, S. A., & Kuperis, S. (1996). Teaching low achievers and students with learning disabilities to plan, write, and revise opinion essays. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(2), 197-212.

Wong, B. Y. L., Butler, D. L., Ficzere, S. A., Kuperis, S., Cordon, M., & Zelmer, J. (1994). Teaching problem learners revision skills and sensitivity to audience through two instructional modes: Student-teacher versus student-student interactive dialogues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9(2), 78-90.