Moving Online: Transforming an Algebra Enrichment Program for Online instruction and the Impacts on Student Learning Experiences and Outcomes

Main Article Content

Hye Jin Park
Kiriko Takahashi
Kendra Nip
Tingting Reid
Jerrik Feliciano
Yoko Kitami
Alejandro Guillen


math program, online implementation, STEM, Native Hawaiian Education , algebra, gifted education, online instruction


(conference proceeding)

Abstract 214 | WORD Downloads 126 PDF Downloads 127 VIDEO [free access] Downloads 0


Adelman, C. (2007). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school
to college. U.S. Department of Education.
Jetter, A. (1993, February 21). Mississippi Learning. The New York Times Magazine, 28–32, 50–51, 64, 72.
Landivar, L.C. (2013). Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race and Hispanic origin (American Community Survey Reports No. ACS-24). U.S. Census Bureau.
Payne, A. (2011). Equitable access for underrepresented students in gifted education. The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
Renzulli, J. S. (1976) The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs
for the gifted and talented: Part II. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 237–243.
Satz, D. (2007). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics, 117(4), 623–648.
Stoelinga,T., & Lynn, J. (2013). Algebra and underprepared learner. UIC Research on Urban Education Policy Initiative Policy BRIEF, 2(3), 1-16.
Yoon, S., & Gentry, M. (2009). Racial and ethnic representations in gifted programs: Current status of and implications for gifted Asian American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 121–136.