Main Article Content
gender and disability, disability studies, global perspective
We would like to welcome you to this special issue of the Review of Disability Studies. This issue focuses upon the intersection of gender and disability within a global perspective. Existing research tells us that disability often presents challenges and barriers to integration and quality of life. The social model of disability (Corker & French, 1999; Shakespeare 2006) assumes that disability is not inherent in the person, but is constructed by society in its failure to provide people with access and treat them with the same respect afforded persons without disabilities.
Brownridge, D. A. (2006). Partner violence against women with disabilities: Prevalence, risk, and explanations. Violence Against Women 12(9), 805-822.
Corker, M., & French, S. (Eds.). (1999). Disability discourse. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1985). Disabled women: Sexism without the pedestal. In M. J. Deegan, & N. A. Brooks (Eds.), Women and disability: The double handicap. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Epilogue: Research and politics to come. In M. Fine & A. Asch (Eds.), Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture and politics (pp. 333-336). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Gerschick, T. (2000). Toward a theory of disability and gender. Signs, 25(4), 1263-1273.
Hart, K. A., Rintala, D. H., & Fuhrer, M. J. (1996). Educational interests of individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community: Medical, sexuality, and wellness topics. Rehabilitation Nursing, 21(2), 82-90.
Kutza, E. A. (1985). A look at national policy and the baby boom generation. Generations (American Society of Aging), 22(1), 16-21.
McGrath, E., Keita, G. P., Strickland, B. R., & Russo, N. F. (1990). Women and depression: Risk factors and treatment issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Mudrick, N. R. (1988). Predictors of disability among midlife men and women: Differences by severity of impairment. Journal of Community Health, 13(2), 70-84.
Nosek, M. A., Foley, C. C., Hughes, R. B., & Howland, C. A. (2001). Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 19(3), 177-189.
Nosek, M. A., Grabois, E., & Howland, C. A. (1992). Top 10 barriers to quality health care for women with disabilities: Research information on independent living, independent living research utilization. Houston, TX: The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research, Baylor College of Medicine.
Nosek, M. A., & Hughes, R. B. (2003). Psychosocial issues of women with physical disabilities: The continuing gender debate. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46(4), 224-234.
O'Hara, B. (2004). Twice penalized: Employment discrimination against women with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15(1), 27-43.
Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London, UK: Routledge.
Traustadottir, R. (1990). Employment, equality, and gender. Retrieved from the website of the Center on Human Policy, Syracuse University http://thechp.syr.edu/workgen.htm.
Warren, L. W., & McEachren, L. (1983). Psychosocial correlates of depressive symptomatology in adult women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92(2), 151-160.